February 2, 2010
Pueblo Chieftain
TELL IT TO THE CHIEFTAIN
Re: “Flaming Gorge pipeline users lining up,” Jan. 15 Chieftain. It’s a stretch for developer Aaron Million to try to sell his grandiose pipeline dream as an “environmental” project that will benefit Colorado’s overtapped rivers.
It’s a promise that, like many of his claims, has yet to be firmed up. What is certain is that the pipeline would draw down Flaming Gorge reservoir levels and risk a host of potential environmental problems, from invasive species and water quality decline in the Green River’s famous fishing waters to degraded wildlife habitat all along the 560-mile route.
Moreover, this project is also lining up fierce opposition all along its route, from towns, communities and Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal who rightly worry about the environmental and economic costs of this boondoggle in the making.
Front Range communities should first consider simpler, less costly measures to meet our region’s water needs, such as conservation, aquifer recharge and leasing. What’s needed most is comprehensive regional water planning, not pie-in-the-sky schemes.
Drew Peternell, director
Colorado Water Project
Trout Unlimited
http://www.chieftain.com/articles/2010/01/24/editorial/doc4b5b971364daf581933349.txt
Leave a Comment » |
Colorado Water Project |
Permalink
Posted by cwptrout
February 1, 2010
Pueblo Chieftain
By SAL PACE
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
When water leaves a community so does the opportunity to attract companies, build homes, draw business or grow crops. When water leaves a community, so does a community’s future opportunity for prosperity. We’re facing tough economic times, but we need to ensure that when we rebound, that we rebound together as an entire state — urban and rural.
That is why I am running House Bill 1159 to require that mitigation plans must be a part of any large transfer of water from one part of the state to another — specifically from one river basin to another. When a farm shuts down operations, the tractor repairman or the fertilizer salesperson will soon close their doors. Under current Colorado water law, there is no legal consideration for the permanent loss to the economy that is felt when water is transferred permanently out of a community.
http://www.chieftain.com/articles/2010/01/31/editorial/doc4b64e1d9f0bc8388687208.txt
Leave a Comment » |
Legislation and Advocacy |
Permalink
Posted by cwptrout
January 31, 2010
By Jessica Fender
The Denver Post
A skirmish between a Texas developer and two rafting outfitters on the Taylor River could throw the futures of Colorado’s rafting companies into jeopardy and leave a lasting imprint on the rights of riverfront landowners. Read more
Read more: http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14303397#ixzz0eCqeHMOH
2 Comments |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by tomkrol
January 30, 2010
by Dale Rodebaugh
[Durango] Herald Staff Writer
The Hermosa Creek watershed – 155,000 acres stretching from the north Animas Valley to just beyond Purgatory – deserves protection because of its sterling water quality and corresponding natural resources, including diverse flora and fauna and recreation, the River Protection Workgroup says. Read more
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by tomkrol
January 29, 2010
By CHRIS WOODKA
THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN
“Front Range communities should first consider simpler, less costly measures to meet our region’s water needs, such as conservation, aquifer recharge and leasing. What’s needed most is comprehensive regional water planning, not pie-in-the-sky schemes,” Drew Peternell of Trout Unlimited wrote in a published letter to The Chieftain.
http://www.chieftain.com/articles/2010/01/29/news/local/doc4b62a2d7376ef917368797.txt
Leave a Comment » |
Colorado Water Project |
Permalink
Posted by cwptrout
January 28, 2010
Eagle Valley Enterprise
Derek Franz
That is the kind of support that has been snowballing for the watershed council. That is also why the river restoration project, which is divided into five reaches, has expanded since it began in the fall of 2008. Local, state and national entities including Edwards Metropolitan District, Eagle River Foundation, Eagle County, Colorado Department of Health and Environment, Trout Unlimited and others have contributed grant money to the efforts.
http://www.eaglevalleyenterprise.com/article/20100127/NEWS/100129974/1054&ParentProfile=1001
Leave a Comment » |
Habitat |
Permalink
Posted by cwptrout
January 27, 2010
Durango Herald
What has been proposed is that 40 percent of the money collected on OHVs goes for law-enforcement activities focused on illegal off-highway vehicle use and enforcing designated routes on public lands. Another 30 percent would go to restore areas damaged by improper or off-trail use of off-highway vehicles. And the final 30 percent would go to maintenance of existing routes, signage, maps and educational outreach.
That seem like an equitable distribution. It is supported by Trout Unlimited, the San Juan Citizens Alliance, Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, the Colorado Mountain Club, Colorado Wild, Great Old Broads for Wilderness about 30 other similarly interested groups.
http://durangoherald.com/sections/Opinion/Editorial/2010/01/27/OHV_fees/
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by cwptrout
January 18, 2010
By Sharon Sullivan
[Grand Junction] Free Press Staff Writer
Despite two rivers flowing through town and a drinking water supply from Grand Mesa, projections from Colorado River Basin Roundtable studies predict significant gaps between water supply and demand by 2050. Read more
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by tomkrol